Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Christina Rosca vs Anne Schaefer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rosca vs Schaefer analysis and find out who is favored!
Christina Rosca vs Anne Schaefer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rosca 1 - 0 Schaefer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rosca has won 34.62% of points on their second serve, while Schaefer has won 46.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rosca, in recent form, has won 57.14% of their opponent's second serve points, while Schaefer has won 56.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.69% and 40.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rosca has saved 48.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schaefer has saved 49.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rosca has won 47.06% of matches played (W/L 8/ 9), with Schaefer winning 54.17% (W/L 13/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rosca has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 40/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Schaefer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 473/ 238), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Rosca has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 8/ 9), where as Schaefer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.52% of matches (W/L 13/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rosca winning 1 times and Schaefer being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Rosca winning 2 and Schaefer winning 1. The last match between Rosca and Schaefer was at the W60 Rome, 12-06-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Christina Rosca getting the victory 5-7 6-0 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rosca and Schaefer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rosca winning 1 times and Schaefer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Rosca winning 0, and Schaefer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rosca has played against opponents with an average rank of 136.29 while Schaefer has played against players with an average rank of 219.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rosca has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schaefer has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rosca has converted 41.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schaefer has converted 38.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
880
Rank
499
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
831
Rank
161
High
37
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
54% (87-73)
Career Total W/L
65% (488-268)
20% (1-4)
YTD W/L
55% (6-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$25,289
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Christina Rosca vs Anne Schaefer For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Rosca VS Schaefer
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Christina Rosca | Anne Schaefer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:22:0 | 2:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (66/101) | 58% (53/92) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (47/66) | 62% (33/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (14/35) | 36% (14/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 27% (3/11) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (45/92) | 40% (40/101) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Christina Rosca
Player
Anne Schaefer
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
106
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Christina Rosca | Anne Schaefer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (1/4) | 55% (6/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) | 54% (13/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 36% (32/58) | 52% (119/110) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 32 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:48 | 1:52:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 126.6 | 185 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (198/276) | 60% (440/728) |
| 1st Serve W% | 46% (91/198) | 57% (249/440) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 35% (27/78) | 46% (133/288) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (17/41) | 39% (47/122) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (147/325) | 47% (369/793) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 60% (6/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (1/5) | 55% (6/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Christina Rosca Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Christina Rosca
47%
(
16 of
34)
1st Serve %
77%
(
24 of
31)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
51
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Christina Rosca
77%
(
70 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
24%
(
5 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sahaja Yamalapalli
Player
Christina Rosca
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
87%
(
45 of
52)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christina Rosca
Player
Patsy Daughters
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
69)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
11
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Akasha Urhobo
Player
Christina Rosca
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
33 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Angella Okutoyi
Player
Christina Rosca
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 2-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Christina Rosca
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christina Rosca
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
21%
(
6 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
52%
(
35 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christina Rosca
Player
Autumn Clemons
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Anne Schaefer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Anne Schaefer
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anne Schaefer
Player
Arianna Zucchini
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Abbagnato
Player
Anne Schaefer
52%
(
68 of
131)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
44%
(
28 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
47%
(
61 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
102)
122
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Anne Schaefer
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Leonie Kung
Player
Anne Schaefer
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anne Schaefer
Player
Alice Rame
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anne Schaefer
Player
Sofia Shapatava
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anne Schaefer
Player
Verena Meliss
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anne Schaefer
Player
Emma Ottavia Ghirardato
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Rosca Vs Schaefer Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Rosca are available here and Schaefer photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
